Conor Tweed

1.3k citations
19 papers · 317 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Conor Tweed

18 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Conor Tweed
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Infectious Diseases 118
  • Pharmacology 42
  • Statistics and Probability 18
  • General Health Professions 47
  • Epidemiology 62
Replace Benjamin Hart with:
Benjamin Hart United States
Marjorie Z. Imperial United States
Hadija Semvua Tanzania
Ferdinand Kassa Belgium
Mustafa E. Ibrahim United States
Johannes P. Mouton South Africa
Vycke Yunivita Indonesia
M. Gninafon Benin
Kristy T. K. Lau Hong Kong
Rachel Ceccarelli United States
Conor Tweed relative to Benjamin Hart United States Benjamin Hart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Benjamin Hart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Conor Tweed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conor Tweed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conor Tweed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conor Tweed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conor Tweed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conor Tweed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conor Tweed. The network helps show where Conor Tweed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Conor Tweed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Conor Tweed Line = papers co-authored together Conor Tweed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201993
2 201853
3 201651
4 201828
5 202022
6 202412
7 202111
8 202210
9 202010
10 20246
11 20206
12 20225
13 20254
14 20172
15 20211
16 20241
17 20231
18 20231
19 20190

About Conor Tweed

Conor Tweed is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Statistics and Probability, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (118 citations), Pharmacology (42 citations), Statistics and Probability (18 citations), General Health Professions (47 citations) and Epidemiology (62 citations). Conor Tweed has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Angela M. Crook, Melvin Spigelman, Rodney Dawson, Carl M. Mendel, Annabelle South, Andrew Nunn, Patrick Phillips, Karen Scott, Mengchun Li and Almari Conradie. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medicine, Research Involvement and Engagement, BMC Pulmonary Medicine, Clinical Trials and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact