Cong Ma

1.1k citations
61 papers · 798 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Cong Ma

57 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Cong Ma
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Water Science and Technology 398
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 68
  • Biomedical Engineering 272
  • Pollution 66
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 41
Replace Peng Wu with:
Peng Wu China
Mehrdad Ebrahimi Germany
Xia He China
Adegoke Isiaka Adetunji South Africa
Abayomi Babatunde Alayande South Korea
Saira Bano Pakistan
Ziyue Wang China
Amjad Khalil Saudi Arabia
Jinglong Li China
Lan Hee Kim South Korea
Cong Ma relative to Peng Wu China Peng Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peng Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Ma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Ma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Ma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Ma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Ma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Ma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Ma. The network helps show where Cong Ma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Ma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Ma Line = papers co-authored together Cong Ma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012129
2 201160
3 201360
4 201637
5 201133
6 202128
7 202121
8 201920
9 201919
10 202319
11 202418
12 201818
13 201718
14 201217
15 202417
16 202017
17 202316
18 201616
19 202016
20 202214

About Cong Ma

Cong Ma is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Pollution and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 61 papers that have together received 798 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Membrane Separation Technologies (20 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (7 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (6 papers), Water Treatment and Disinfection (5 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (5 papers), Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods (4 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (4 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (398 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (68 citations), Biomedical Engineering (272 citations), Pollution (66 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (41 citations). Cong Ma has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Xin Yi, Nian X. Sun, Limin Jin, Shuili Yu, Wei Shi, Ge Yu, Sen Wang, Liping Sun, Wen Shi and Songyi Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Desalination, Chemosphere, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact