Cong Deng

451 citations
27 papers · 363 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Cong Deng

25 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

Cong Deng
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 35
  • Ophthalmology 62
  • Neurology 27
  • Molecular Biology 166
  • Cancer Research 26
Replace Qiuling Liu with:
Qiuling Liu China
Aiping Jin China
Lu Yang Cheng China
Dibyendu Chakraborty United States
Christopher J. Wallick United States
Lucia Sedlackova United Kingdom
Victoria J. Pye Australia
Eszter Dombi United Kingdom
Stephanie Muise Canada
Tanu Parmar United States
Cong Deng relative to Qiuling Liu China Qiuling Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Qiuling Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Deng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Deng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Deng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Deng. The network helps show where Cong Deng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Deng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Deng Line = papers co-authored together Cong Deng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201876
2
Autophagy inhibitor regulates apoptosis and proliferation of synovial fibroblasts through the inhibition of PI3K/AKT pathway in collagen-induced arthritis rat model.
201749
3 202035
4 201630
5 201521
6 201720
7 202120
8 201520
9 202019
10 202316
11
Role of the PGE2 receptor in ischemia-reperfusion injury of the rat retina.
202013
12 202011
13 20217
14 20214
15 20233
16 20223
17 20203
18
[Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter of GABAA receptor β2 subunit gene with schizophrenia].
20152
19 20242
20 20212

About Cong Deng

Cong Deng is a scholar working on Hematology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Molecular Biology and Immunology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (4 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (2 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (2 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (2 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (2 papers) and Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (35 citations), Ophthalmology (62 citations), Neurology (27 citations), Molecular Biology (166 citations) and Cancer Research (26 citations). Cong Deng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Netherlands and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Yulian Pang, Xu Zhang, Wei Ye, Jiejie Zhuang, Tiansheng Zeng, Jing Tian, Xi Xie, Shu Li, Wenhui Huang and Jinwei Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cancer, The Pharmacogenomics Journal, Acupuncture in Medicine, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology and Frontiers in Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact