Con Stough

285 papers receiving 10.6k citations

Peers

Con Stough
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 1.4k
  • Biological Psychiatry 343
  • Social Psychology 2.8k
  • Toxicology 398
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
Replace Martin Prince with:
Martin Prince United Kingdom
Lin Lü China
James C. Anthony United States
Henry Brodaty Australia
Luke A. Downey Australia
Harvey Whiteford Australia
Per Bech Denmark
Laura Fratiglioni Sweden
Carol Brayne United Kingdom
Melanie M. Wall United States
Con Stough relative to Martin Prince United Kingdom Martin Prince's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.0×
Martin Prince · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Con Stough

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Con Stough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Con Stough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Con Stough more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Con Stough

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Con Stough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Con Stough. The network helps show where Con Stough may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Con Stough, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Con Stough Line = papers co-authored together Con Stough links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 287 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001434
2 2002412
3 2002383
4 2011316
5 1997277
6 2003269
7 2001234
8 2001204
9 2005198
10 2012175
11 1996169
12 2010168
13 2009150
14 2005135
15 2004131
16 2013119
17 2011117
18 2010117
19 2002114
20 2006111

About Con Stough

Con Stough is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Complementary and alternative medicine, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 287 papers that have together received 11.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotional Intelligence and Performance (33 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (26 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (23 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (20 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (19 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (18 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (15 papers) and Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (1.4k citations), Biological Psychiatry (343 citations), Social Psychology (2.8k citations), Toxicology (398 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k citations). Con Stough has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Luke A. Downey, Benjamin R. Palmer, Andrew Scholey, Ian J. Deary, Lisa Gardner, Jerome Sarris, Andrew Pipingas, David Camfield, Rodney J. Croft and Pradeep J. Nathan. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Psychopharmacology, Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental, European Neuropsychopharmacology and Nutrients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact