Con Stough

297 papers receiving 11.4k citations

Peers

Con Stough
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 1.6k
  • Biological Psychiatry 355
  • Social Psychology 3.1k
  • Toxicology 418
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
Replace Martin Prince with:
Martin Prince United Kingdom
Lin Lü China
James C. Anthony United States
Henry Brodaty Australia
Luke A. Downey Australia
Per Bech Denmark
Harvey Whiteford Australia
Laura Fratiglioni Sweden
Carol Brayne United Kingdom
Kate Moore United States
Con Stough relative to Martin Prince United Kingdom Martin Prince's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.1×
Martin Prince · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Con Stough

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Con Stough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Con Stough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Con Stough more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Con Stough

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Con Stough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Con Stough. The network helps show where Con Stough may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Con Stough, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Con Stough Line = papers co-authored together Con Stough links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 300 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001474
2 2002450
3 2002396
4 2011353
5 1997310
6 2003286
7 2001270
8 2005215
9 2001209
10 1996199
11 2012178
12 2010176
13 2009167
14 2005139
15 2004135
16 2013127
17 2011124
18 2010120
19 2006118
20 2002118

About Con Stough

Con Stough is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 300 papers that have together received 12.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotional Intelligence and Performance (38 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (29 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (23 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (23 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (20 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (20 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (15 papers) and Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (1.6k citations), Biological Psychiatry (355 citations), Social Psychology (3.1k citations), Toxicology (418 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations). Con Stough has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Luke A. Downey, Benjamin R. Palmer, Andrew Scholey, Ian J. Deary, Lisa Gardner, Jerome Sarris, Andrew Pipingas, Gilles E. Gignac, David Camfield and Rodney J. Croft. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Personality and Individual Differences, Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental, European Neuropsychopharmacology and Phytotherapy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact