Colin Jager

519 citations
18 papers · 127 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Colin Jager

13 papers receiving 73 citations

Peers

Colin Jager
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Philosophy 38
  • Religious studies 16
  • History 33
  • Literature and Literary Theory 34
  • Political Science and International Relations 44
Replace Jonathan Sheehan with:
Jonathan Sheehan United States
Patrick Henry United States
Tom Furniss United Kingdom
Timothy Larsen United States
Sylvana Tomaselli United Kingdom
Geoffrey Rowell United Kingdom
Robert B. Luehrs United States
Karen Louise Jolly United States
Michel Despland Canada
Barbara Spackman United States
Colin Jager relative to Jonathan Sheehan United States Jonathan Sheehan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jonathan Sheehan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Jager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Jager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Jager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Jager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Jager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Jager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Jager. The network helps show where Colin Jager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Colin Jager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Jager Line = papers co-authored together Colin Jager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200757
2
The Book of God: Secularization and Design in the Romantic Era
200631
3
The book of God
20067
4 20146
5 20024
6 20064
7 20123
8 20103
9 20013
10 20163
11 20092
12 20192
13 20182
14 20080
15 20220
16 20160
17 20080
18 20070

About Colin Jager

Colin Jager is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Philosophy and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 18 papers that have together received 127 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (2 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper) and Architecture and Cultural Influences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (38 citations), Religious studies (16 citations), History (33 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (34 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (44 citations). Colin Jager has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vincent P. Pecora, John L. Mahoney and Heather I. Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Quarterly, European Romantic Review, The Modern Language Review, Literature Compass and Public Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact