Current Science

7.5k papers and 87.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.5k papers published in Current Science in the last decades have received a total of 87.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Science usually cover Plant Science (1.4k papers), Molecular Biology (843 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (620 papers) specifically the topics of earthquake and tectonic studies (188 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (163 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (159 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Science are Anindya Chatterjee, R. K. Sairam, Ranajit K. Banerjee, Uday Bandyopadhyay, M. Rajeevan, Aruna Tyagi, Ishita Chattopadhyay, Kaushik Biswas, Soumen Bhattacharjee and Ashok Kumar Tiwari.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Science.

Countries where authors publish in Current Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025