Clinton Schultz

470 citations
8 papers · 360 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Clinton Schultz

7 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Clinton Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Health 182
  • General Health Professions 45
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 22
  • Law 23
  • Clinical Psychology 32
Replace Yuria Celidwen with:
Yuria Celidwen United States
Lewis Williams Canada
Kyle X. Hill United States
Nicole Marie Lindsay New Zealand
Melody E. Morton Ninomiya Canada
Shanondora Billiot United States
Karla Jessen Williamson Canada
Felicia M. Mitchell United States
Angela Mashford‐Pringle Canada
Felecia Watkin Lui Australia
Clinton Schultz relative to Yuria Celidwen United States Yuria Celidwen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Yuria Celidwen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clinton Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton Schultz. The network helps show where Clinton Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clinton Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clinton Schultz Line = papers co-authored together Clinton Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing
2014176
2 2020100
3 202044
4
Cultural Competence – Transforming Policy, Services, Programs and Practice
201430
5
Interdisciplinary Care to Enhance Mental Health and Social and Emotional Wellbeing
20144
6 20234
7 20222
8 20250

About Clinton Schultz

Clinton Schultz is a scholar working on Health, Statistics and Probability, Law, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (5 papers), Environmental law and policy (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper), Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (182 citations), General Health Professions (45 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (22 citations), Law (23 citations) and Clinical Psychology (32 citations). Clinton Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Graham Gee, Pat Dudgeon, Kerrie Kelly, Nicole Redvers, Marlikka Perdrisat, Anne Poelina, Roz Walker, Christopher C. Sonn, Rhys Jones and Dawn C Bessarab. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Medical Teacher, Murdoch University Research Portal, UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) and Challenges.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact