Clemence Due

3.8k citations
158 papers · 2.5k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Clemence Due

149 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Clemence Due
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • Reproductive Medicine 193
  • Sociology and Political Science 773
  • General Health Professions 366
  • Social Psychology 316
Replace Rebecca M. Ryan with:
Rebecca M. Ryan United States
Ellie Lee United Kingdom
Jay Fagan United States
Rob Palkovitz United States
Claire M. Kamp Dush United States
Jan Gerris Netherlands
Sarah J. Schoppe‐Sullivan United States
Pauline Boss United States
Kei Nomaguchi United States
Fabio Scorsolini‐Comin Brazil
Clemence Due relative to Rebecca M. Ryan United States Rebecca M. Ryan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Rebecca M. Ryan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clemence Due

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clemence Due's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clemence Due with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clemence Due more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clemence Due

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clemence Due. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clemence Due. The network helps show where Clemence Due may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clemence Due, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clemence Due Line = papers co-authored together Clemence Due links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 158 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020124
2 2013109
3 2017100
4 201487
5 202086
6 201879
7 201377
8 201975
9 202073
10 201771
11 201560
12 201657
13 201848
14 201746
15 201445
16 202144
17 201037
18 201637
19 201334
20 201733

About Clemence Due

Clemence Due is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Education, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 158 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (53 papers), Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees (20 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (20 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (16 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (15 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (11 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Reproductive Medicine (193 citations), Sociology and Political Science (773 citations), General Health Professions (366 citations) and Social Psychology (316 citations). Clemence Due has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ethiopia and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Damien W. Riggs, Anna Ziersch, Kate Obst, Martha Augoustinos, Moira Walsh, Melissa Oxlad, Philippa Middleton, Diana Dorstyn, Matthew Hartley and Anna Chur‐Hansen. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Psychologist, Women and Birth, BMC Public Health, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth and Disability and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact