Claus Scheiderer

1.6k citations
60 papers · 676 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Claus Scheiderer

56 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

Claus Scheiderer
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Geometry and Topology 381
  • Algebra and Number Theory 191
  • Numerical Analysis 133
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 337
  • Mathematical Physics 191
Replace Victor Vinnikov with:
Victor Vinnikov Israel
Bit-Shun Tam Taiwan
Masahiro Shiota Japan
Adam Parusiński France
Vladimir V. Sergeichuk Ukraine
Jacek Bochnak Netherlands
Alexander Guterman Russia
Henri Lombardi France
Nam‐Kiu Tsing United States
Tin-Yau Tam United States
Claus Scheiderer relative to Victor Vinnikov Israel Victor Vinnikov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Victor Vinnikov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Claus Scheiderer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claus Scheiderer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claus Scheiderer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claus Scheiderer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claus Scheiderer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claus Scheiderer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claus Scheiderer. The network helps show where Claus Scheiderer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Claus Scheiderer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Claus Scheiderer Line = papers co-authored together Claus Scheiderer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199959
2 199457
3 198955
4 200354
5 200645
6 200531
7 200524
8 198922
9 199820
10 201820
11 199620
12 200119
13 200815
14 199615
15 201313
16 199713
17 199213
18 200411
19 201410
20 20209

About Claus Scheiderer

Claus Scheiderer is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (23 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (17 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (12 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (11 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (8 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (7 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (7 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (381 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (191 citations), Numerical Analysis (133 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (337 citations) and Mathematical Physics (191 citations). Claus Scheiderer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Manfred Knebusch, Mihai Putinar, Jean-Louis Colliot-Thélène, Yuval Z. Flicker, R. Sujatha, Salma Kuhlmann, Maria Charina, Joachim Stöckler, Pierre Lochak and Leila Schneps. Their work appears in journals such as manuscripta mathematica, Mathematische Zeitschrift, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Inventiones mathematicae and Journal of Algebra.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact