Claus Beisbart

58 papers receiving 952 citations

Peers

Claus Beisbart
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • History and Philosophy of Science 212
  • Health Informatics 42
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 196
  • Instrumentation 35
  • Computational Mathematics 5
Replace Arthur I. Miller with:
Arthur I. Miller United States
Don Howard United States
Eric Winsberg United States
Philipp Frank Germany
Laura Trouille United States
Allan Franklin United States
Peter Milne United States
Mathias Frisch Germany
Diderik Batens Belgium
Isaac Newton United States
Claus Beisbart relative to Arthur I. Miller United States Arthur I. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.5×
Arthur I. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Claus Beisbart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claus Beisbart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claus Beisbart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claus Beisbart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claus Beisbart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claus Beisbart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claus Beisbart. The network helps show where Claus Beisbart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Claus Beisbart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Claus Beisbart Line = papers co-authored together Claus Beisbart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201185
2 201980
3 200968
4
What Is Understanding? An Overview of Recent Debates in Epistemology and Philosophy of Science
201766
5 200066
6 200157
7 202343
8 201243
9 200540
10 201236
11 200235
12 202230
13 200929
14 200728
15 202225
16 200625
17 201723
18 200121
19 202117
20 200217

About Claus Beisbart

Claus Beisbart is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Information Systems and Management, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (24 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (10 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (9 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers) and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (212 citations), Health Informatics (42 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (196 citations), Instrumentation (35 citations) and Computational Mathematics (5 citations). Claus Beisbart has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include M. Kerscher, Stephan Hartmann, Nicole J. Saam, Luc Bovens, Klaus Mecke, Georg Brun, Christoph Baumberger, Stephan Hartmann, John D. Norton and Thomas Buchert. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Public Choice and International Journal of Astrobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact