Daniel Hook

1.7k citations
32 papers · 1.0k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hook

30 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 395
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 130
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 487
  • Information Systems and Management 68
  • Health Informatics 9
Replace Ana Marı́a Cetto with:
Ana Marı́a Cetto Mexico
Giacomo Livan United Kingdom
Ralph Kenna United Kingdom
Peter Millington United Kingdom
Bertrand Berche France
Zeeya Merali United States
James Testa United States
A. Tarancón Spain
R. Srikanth India
L. Santamaría Germany
Daniel Hook relative to Ana Marı́a Cetto Mexico Ana Marı́a Cetto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ana Marı́a Cetto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hook. The network helps show where Daniel Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hook Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018206
2 2018156
3 2007154
4 2020148
5 200864
6 201045
7 202134
8 202433
9 201932
10 200728
11 201118
12 201714
13 201414
14 200513
15 201013
16 201412
17 200711
18 20188
19 20197
20 20216

About Daniel Hook

Daniel Hook is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Information Systems and Management, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (12 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (10 papers), Research Data Management Practices (5 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (3 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (2 papers) and Library Science and Information Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (395 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (130 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (487 citations), Information Systems and Management (68 citations) and Health Informatics (9 citations). Daniel Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christian Herzog, Carl M. Bender, Simon Porter, Stacy Konkiel, Dorje C. Brody, Clare Dunning, Andreas Fring, G. Lévai, H. F. Jones and Roberto Tateo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Quantitative Science Studies, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. A and Reviews of Modern Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact