Claudio Moser
Impact in
- Plant Science top 1%
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Food Science top 1%
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Papers in
-
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 44
-
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 20
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 15
- Plant Reproductive Biology 7
- Biochemical and Structural Characterization 5
- Co-authors
- Riccardo Velasco (21 shared papers)Urška Vrhovšek (16 shared papers)S. Pilati (18 shared papers)Giulia Malacarne (19 shared papers)Marco Moretto (9 shared papers)M. Stefanini (10 shared papers)Paolo Fontana (5 shared papers)Fulvio Mattivi (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Claudio Moser
82 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Claudio Moser's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Plant Science 1.9k
- Food Science 728
- Horticulture 36
- Biochemistry 201
- Molecular Biology 2.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Moser
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Moser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Moser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Moser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio Moser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Moser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Moser. The network helps show where Claudio Moser may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Claudio Moser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | An unusual member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily responsible for X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 656 |
| 2 | 2007 | 197 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 156 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 137 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 133 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 125 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 107 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 106 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 105 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 96 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 92 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 91 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 90 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 82 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 73 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 69 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 68 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 68 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 56 |
About Claudio Moser
Claudio Moser is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Cell Biology and Ecology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Horticultural and Viticultural Research (44 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (22 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (20 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (15 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (9 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (7 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (5 papers) and Biochemical and biochemical processes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.9k citations), Food Science (728 citations), Horticulture (36 citations), Biochemistry (201 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.0k citations). Claudio Moser has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Riccardo Velasco, Urška Vrhovšek, S. Pilati, Giulia Malacarne, Marco Moretto, M. Stefanini, Paolo Fontana, Fulvio Mattivi, Elena Zanaria and Paolo Sassone‐Corsi. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Plant Science, Journal of Experimental Botany, BMC Genomics, Biomolecules and BMC Plant Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.