Claudio Gnoli

47 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

Claudio Gnoli
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Communication 26
  • Developmental Biology 8
  • General Arts and Humanities 4
  • Artificial Intelligence 113
  • Information Systems and Management 23
Replace Joseph T. Tennis with:
Joseph T. Tennis United States
Pauline Rafferty United Kingdom
Carol A. Bean United States
Claus-Peter Klas Germany
Ted Underwood United States
Stephan Greene United States
Daan Odijk Netherlands
Terrell Russell United States
Ingetraut Dahlberg Germany
Margaret E. I. Kipp United States
Claudio Gnoli relative to Joseph T. Tennis United States Joseph T. Tennis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Joseph T. Tennis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Gnoli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Gnoli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Gnoli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Gnoli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio Gnoli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Gnoli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Gnoli. The network helps show where Claudio Gnoli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Claudio Gnoli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Claudio Gnoli Line = papers co-authored together Claudio Gnoli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201635
2 200428
3
ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization
201623
4 200820
5 200616
6 201214
7 200813
8 201411
9 201810
10 20088
11 20168
12 19957
13 20177
14 20106
15 20206
16
Concepts as Particles. Metaphors for the Universe of Knowledge
20106
17 20245
18 20185
19
BC2 classes for phenomena : an application of the theory of integrative levels
20055
20 20154

About Claudio Gnoli

Claudio Gnoli is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Information Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 60 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (16 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (8 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (5 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (3 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (3 papers), Management, Economics, and Public Policy (2 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (26 citations), Developmental Biology (8 citations), General Arts and Humanities (4 citations), Artificial Intelligence (113 citations) and Information Systems and Management (23 citations). Claudio Gnoli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Rick Szostak, Roberto Poli, Birger Hjørland, Hong Mei, Richard P. Smiraglia, Fulvio Mazzocchi, Claudio Prigioni, Koraljka Golub, Ali Shiri and David Haynes. Their work appears in journals such as KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, Journal of Documentation, Axiomathes, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology and Foundations of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact