Roberto Poli

143 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Roberto Poli
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • History and Philosophy of Science 177
  • Management Science and Operations Research 345
  • General Psychology 31
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 283
  • Artificial Intelligence 692
Replace Ernest Edmonds with:
Ernest Edmonds United Kingdom
David A. Lagnado United Kingdom
Uri Nodelman United States
Karl Halvor Teigen Norway
R. Schank United States
Joshua Klayman United States
Peter Ayton United Kingdom
Marjan Bakker Netherlands
Abraham Kaplan Israel
David Spurrett South Africa
Roberto Poli relative to Ernest Edmonds United Kingdom Ernest Edmonds's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Ernest Edmonds · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Poli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Poli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Poli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Poli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Poli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Poli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Poli. The network helps show where Roberto Poli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Poli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberto Poli Line = papers co-authored together Roberto Poli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 159 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010297
2
GECCO 2002: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference
2002217
3 2011146
4 2017139
5 2010131
6 2001110
7
Clinical aspects of fatigue in multiple sclerosis.
1998101
8 201788
9 201080
10
A Note on the Difference Between Complicated and Complex Social Systems
201370
11 199366
12 201359
13 201154
14 201445
15 200645
16 201442
17 201042
18 200437
19 199637
20 200736

About Roberto Poli

Roberto Poli is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 159 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (24 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (11 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (8 papers) and Language and Culture (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (177 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (345 citations), General Psychology (31 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (283 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (692 citations). Roberto Poli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jan Woleński, Liliana Albertazzi, Sergio Barlati, Giacomo Deste, Antonio Vita, Emilio Sacchetti, Maurizio Versino, A. Romani, Rajkumar Roy and Vasant Honavar. Their work appears in journals such as Axiomathes, Schizophrenia Research, Futures, Grazer Philosophische Studien and International Journal of General Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact