Roberto Poli

91 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Roberto Poli
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
  • Management Science and Operations Research 214
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 182
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 162
  • General Psychology 16
  • History and Philosophy of Science 57
Replace Peter Ayton with:
Peter Ayton United Kingdom
Marjan Bakker Netherlands
Douglas J. Herrmann United States
Gideon Nave United States
Joachim Funke Germany
David A. Lagnado United Kingdom
Jean‐François Richard France
Nathalie Percie du Sert United Kingdom
Ilan Yaniv Israel
Howard J. Weiner United States
Roberto Poli relative to Peter Ayton United Kingdom Peter Ayton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Peter Ayton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Poli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Poli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Poli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Poli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Poli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Poli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Poli. The network helps show where Roberto Poli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Poli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberto Poli Line = papers co-authored together Roberto Poli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010250
2 2011139
3 2010102
4
Clinical aspects of fatigue in multiple sclerosis.
1998100
5 201798
6 201781
7 200177
8 201057
9 201355
10
A Note on the Difference Between Complicated and Complex Social Systems
201355
11 201152
12 201437
13 201029
14 201429
15
.67 Steps Toward an Explicit Ontology of the Future
201129
16 200629
17 200428
18 198225
19 201025
20 201824

About Roberto Poli

Roberto Poli is a scholar working on Philosophy, Management Science and Operations Research, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (14 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (6 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (5 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Language and Culture (4 papers) and Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (214 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (182 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (162 citations), General Psychology (16 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (57 citations). Roberto Poli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Giacomo Deste, Sergio Barlati, Emilio Sacchetti, Antonio Vita, A. Romani, Maurizio Versino, Vittorio Cosi, Roberto Bergamaschi, Luca De Peri and Riel Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Axiomathes, Futures, Schizophrenia Research, foresight and International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact