Claes Tropé

609 citations
13 papers · 443 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Claes Tropé

12 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Claes Tropé
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Reproductive Medicine 307
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 197
  • Cancer Research 49
  • Oncology 76
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 48
Replace Ferdinando Coronetta with:
Ferdinando Coronetta Italy
Ryuichiro Tsunematsu Japan
K. Ohmi Japan
Melina Shoni United States
Kari Høeg Norway
Nobuhiro Tsuruchi Japan
Elly Brockbank United Kingdom
Lucía González‐Cortijo Spain
Kazuya Ariyoshi Japan
A. Di Legge Italy
Claes Tropé relative to Ferdinando Coronetta Italy Ferdinando Coronetta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ferdinando Coronetta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Claes Tropé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claes Tropé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claes Tropé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claes Tropé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claes Tropé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claes Tropé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claes Tropé. The network helps show where Claes Tropé may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Claes Tropé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Claes Tropé Line = papers co-authored together Claes Tropé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1993125
2 199289
3 199049
4 200139
5 199734
6 199225
7 199223
8 199621
9 199617
10 19909
11 20006
12 19996
13
[Endometrial hyperplasia--diagnosis and treatment].
19990

About Claes Tropé

Claes Tropé is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (1 paper) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (307 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (197 citations), Cancer Research (49 citations), Oncology (76 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (48 citations). Claes Tropé has collaborated with scholars based in Norway and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Vera M. Abeler, J. Kærn, Kjell E. Kjørstad, Gunnar B. Kristensen, Magne Aas, Mette Winderen Lindegaard, Ignace Vergote, Heidi Lyng, Einar K. Rofstad and Kolbein Sundfør. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact