K. Ohmi

704 citations
24 papers · 535 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

K. Ohmi

24 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

K. Ohmi
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 282
  • Reproductive Medicine 163
  • Epidemiology 108
  • Oncology 72
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 44
Replace Ryuichiro Tsunematsu with:
Ryuichiro Tsunematsu Japan
Melina Shoni United States
K.J. Lohe Germany
Esther Oliva United States
Sakae HATA Japan
Claes Tropé Norway
Wharton Jt United States
Tsutomu Yuminamochi Japan
WLJ van Putten Netherlands
Britta Nordström Sweden
K. Ohmi relative to Ryuichiro Tsunematsu Japan Ryuichiro Tsunematsu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ryuichiro Tsunematsu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Ohmi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Ohmi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Ohmi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Ohmi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Ohmi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Ohmi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Ohmi. The network helps show where K. Ohmi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Ohmi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Ohmi Line = papers co-authored together K. Ohmi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198887
2 200385
3 198579
4 198852
5 199850
6 200231
7 199518
8 199817
9 199517
10 200116
11 200216
12 200412
13 198612
14 200211
15 20016
16 19905
17
The frequency of papillomavirus infection in cervical precancerous lesions in Japan: an immunoperoxidase study.
19864
18
[Clinical study of recombinant interferon alpha-2 (Sch 30500) in advanced gynecological cancers].
19854
19 19914
20 20023

About K. Ohmi

K. Ohmi is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (15 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (8 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (1 paper) and Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (282 citations), Reproductive Medicine (163 citations), Epidemiology (108 citations), Oncology (72 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (44 citations). K. Ohmi has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ryuichiro Tsunematsu, Takahiro Kasamatsu, T. Kasamatsu, Takuro Yamada, Shin‐ichi Teshima, Kiyozo Kishi, Yukío Shimosato, Noriyuki Katsumata, Takashi Yamada and T Sonoda. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Gynecologic Oncology and Cancer Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact