Cindy Poo
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 7
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 1
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 7
- Co-authors
- Jeffry S. Isaacson (4 shared papers)James Fitzhugh Sturgill (1 shared paper)Naoshige Uchida (1 shared paper)Rafi Haddad (1 shared paper)Gautam Agarwal (1 shared paper)Niccolò Bonacchi (1 shared paper)Zachary F. Mainen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuron (3 papers)Annual Review of Neuroscience (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)eScholarship (California Digital Library) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPortugalIsrael
In The Last Decade
Cindy Poo
7 papers receiving 967 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Sensory Systems 714
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 695
- Cognitive Neuroscience 347
- Nutrition and Dietetics 272
- Biomedical Engineering 260
Countries citing papers authored by Cindy Poo
This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy Poo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy Poo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy Poo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy Poo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy Poo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy Poo. The network helps show where Cindy Poo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Cindy Poo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 352 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 201 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 106 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 95 | |
| 5 | Odor representations in olfactory cortex | 2010 | 86 |
| 6 | 2021 | 81 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 60 |
About Cindy Poo
Cindy Poo is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics, Biomedical Engineering and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 7 papers that have together received 981 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (714 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (695 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (347 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (272 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (260 citations). Cindy Poo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jeffry S. Isaacson, James Fitzhugh Sturgill, Naoshige Uchida, Rafi Haddad, Gautam Agarwal, Niccolò Bonacchi and Zachary F. Mainen. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Annual Review of Neuroscience, Nature, Journal of Neuroscience and eScholarship (California Digital Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.