Cindy Lin

22 papers receiving 324 citations

Cindy Lin's Hit Papers

A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence 2022 · 171 citations
1710+1+2Years since publication50100150

Peers

Cindy Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Human-Computer Interaction 85
  • Business and International Management 11
  • Safety Research 30
  • Computer Science Applications 21
  • Museology 13
Replace Drew Hemment with:
Drew Hemment United Kingdom
Qiqi Zhou Netherlands
Joel Fredericks Australia
Sander Münster Germany
Meng Cai United States
Graeme P. Earl United Kingdom
Yong Ju Jung United States
Soyoung Lee South Korea
Jamie O’Brien United States
Jeremy Huggett United Kingdom
Cindy Lin relative to Drew Hemment United Kingdom Drew Hemment's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Drew Hemment · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cindy Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy Lin. The network helps show where Cindy Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cindy Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cindy Lin Line = papers co-authored together Cindy Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence
Hit paper breakdown →
2022171
2 202139
3 201729
4 202022
5 201716
6 201913
7 202313
8 201612
9 20227
10 20155
11 20225
12 20165
13 20244
14 19964
15 20223
16 20252
17 20162
18 20262
19 20252
20 20261

About Cindy Lin

Cindy Lin is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Management and Safety Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (3 papers), Design Education and Practice (2 papers), Persona Design and Applications (2 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (2 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 papers) and ICT in Developing Communities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (85 citations), Business and International Management (11 citations), Safety Research (30 citations), Computer Science Applications (21 citations) and Museology (13 citations). Cindy Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Silvia Lindtner, Steven J. Jackson, Seyram Avle, Jean Hardÿ, Shaowen Bardzell, Jeffrey Bardzell, Austin L. Toombs, Carsten Röcker, Lynn S. Dombrowski and Jen Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, CoDesign, Computers & Geosciences, Journal of Surgical Research and Earth and Space Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact