Cihat Erbil

436 citations
44 papers · 257 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Cihat Erbil

34 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Cihat Erbil
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Gender Studies 100
  • Safety Research 39
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 34
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 2
  • Social Psychology 32
Replace Ziyu Long with:
Ziyu Long United States
Faye K. Cocchiara United States
Angelika Schmidt Austria
Patricia S. Parker United States
Feride Acar Türkiye
Norma Carr‐Ruffino United States
Rebecca M. Paluch United States
Karen A. Longman United States
Mônica Carvalho Alves Cappelle Brazil
Angela Kornau Germany
Cihat Erbil relative to Ziyu Long United States Ziyu Long's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13×
Ziyu Long · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cihat Erbil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cihat Erbil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cihat Erbil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cihat Erbil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cihat Erbil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cihat Erbil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cihat Erbil. The network helps show where Cihat Erbil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Cihat Erbil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cihat Erbil Line = papers co-authored together Cihat Erbil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202236
2 202135
3 202127
4 202317
5 202316
6 202415
7 202411
8 202310
9
Post-hümanist İnovasyon: Gig Ekonomi Özelinde Moto Kuryeli Teslimat Sektörü Örneklemi
20219
10 20239
11 20239
12 20249
13 20247
14 20235
15 20224
16 20244
17 20244
18 20244
19 20244
20 20233

About Cihat Erbil

Cihat Erbil is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Safety Research, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (17 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers), Disability Education and Employment (3 papers), Gender and Feminist Studies (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (100 citations), Safety Research (39 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (34 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (2 citations) and Social Psychology (32 citations). Cihat Erbil has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Mustafa F. Özbilgin, Rıfat Kamaşak, Mehtap Çakmak Barsbay, Zeynep Aycan, Elif Karaosmanoğlu, Alptekin Sökmen, Joana Vassilopoulou, İbrahim Semih Akçomak, Dimitria Groutsis and Kurt A. April. Their work appears in journals such as Human Resource Management Journal, Gender Work and Organization, Studies in Higher Education, Globalisation Societies and Education and Employee Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact