Christopher Smith

39 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

Christopher Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Family Practice 17
  • Health 44
  • Genetics 48
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 59
  • Anthropology 35
Replace Kyle B. Brothers with:
Kyle B. Brothers United States
Xiaoping Lin China
Michael C. Bond United States
José Roberto Goldim Brazil
Manfred Maier Austria
Sun Hwa Shin South Korea
Jane Brown United Kingdom
Neeraj Arora United States
Emmanuel Peprah United States
Shalini Gupta United States
Christopher Smith relative to Kyle B. Brothers United States Kyle B. Brothers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Kyle B. Brothers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Smith. The network helps show where Christopher Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Smith Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011170
2 201093
3 197961
4 200359
5 199450
6 200850
7
Modus operandi : essays in honour of Geoffrey Rickman
199842
8 199431
9 197628
10 199122
11 200114
12 197710
13 199010
14 20199
15 20169
16 19889
17 19779
18 19779
19 19818
20 19777

About Christopher Smith

Christopher Smith is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 44 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (11 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (5 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (4 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers) and Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (17 citations), Health (44 citations), Genetics (48 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (59 citations) and Anthropology (35 citations). Christopher Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Sahar F. Deraz, Ashraf A. Khalil, Jed D. Gonzalo, Cynthia H. Chuang, Grace C. Huang, G. D. CHISHOLM, R. Ghanadian, Darwin L. Thomas, Andrew J. Weigert and Sos С. Agaian. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, European Urology, Annals of Emergency Medicine, IEEE Signal Processing Letters and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact