Christopher Leone

36 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Christopher Leone
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Applied Psychology 159
  • General Decision Sciences 36
  • Social Psychology 317
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 119
  • Sociology and Political Science 321
Replace Carol E. Ford with:
Carol E. Ford United States
Jill M. Leibold United States
Helen C. Boucher United States
Thomas J. Schoeneman United States
Lara K. Kammrath United States
Anthony D. Hermann United States
Ericka Nus Simms United States
Philip Broemer Germany
Betty S. Witcher United States
Zoe Kinias United States
Christopher Leone relative to Carol E. Ford United States Carol E. Ford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Carol E. Ford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Leone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Leone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Leone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Leone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Leone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Leone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Leone. The network helps show where Christopher Leone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Leone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Leone Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Leone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977172
2 201044
3 198842
4 200040
5 198740
6 201538
7 197833
8 199925
9 200624
10 200620
11 199417
12 199117
13 200317
14 201314
15 200014
16 198614
17 198914
18 201810
19 20089
20 20199

About Christopher Leone

Christopher Leone is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (18 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (159 citations), General Decision Sciences (36 citations), Social Psychology (317 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (119 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (321 citations). Christopher Leone has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Abraham Tesser, Joshua J. Clarkson, Zakary L. Tormala, E. Gil Clary, William G. Graziano, Lynn M. Musser, Gary J. Lautenschlager, Harry M. Wallace, Frank R. Kardes and Edward R. Hirt. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, The Journal of Social Psychology, Self and Identity, Journal of Personality and The Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact