Christopher Lee

9 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Christopher Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Human-Computer Interaction 71
  • Social Psychology 195
  • Artificial Intelligence 130
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 39
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 56
Replace Anna Okhmatovskaia with:
Anna Okhmatovskaia United States
Divesh Lala Japan
Dimosthenis Kontogiorgos Sweden
Catherine Vaucelle United States
Gene Ball United Kingdom
Jacqueline Urakami Japan
Heidy Maldonado United States
Raquel Oliveira Portugal
Yueh-Hsuan Chiang United States
Norihisa Miyake Japan
Christopher Lee relative to Anna Okhmatovskaia United States Anna Okhmatovskaia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Anna Okhmatovskaia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Lee. The network helps show where Christopher Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Lee Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2004268
2
Authority and influence: Australian literary criticism 1950-2000
200125
3 19997
4 20127
5 20175
6
BELAJAR VISUALISASI DATA dengan GRAFIS dan INFOGRAFIS STEP BY STEP
20184
7
The Australian Girl Catches the First Feminist Wave
19932
8 20172
9 20112
10
This Sceptred Isle
20041
11
Turning the century: writing of the 1890s
19991
12 20190
13
Belajar Excel Macro VBA Step-by-Step
20170
14 20070

About Christopher Lee

Christopher Lee is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Conservation and Computer Science Applications, having authored 14 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (3 papers), Robotics and Automated Systems (2 papers), Decision Support System Applications (2 papers), Real-Time Systems Scheduling (1 paper), Asian American and Pacific Histories (1 paper), Computer Science and Engineering (1 paper), Interdisciplinary Studies and Sociocultural Dynamics (1 paper) and Media Studies and Communication (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (71 citations), Social Psychology (195 citations), Artificial Intelligence (130 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (39 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (56 citations). Christopher Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Cory D. Kidd, Candace L. Sidner, Neal B. Lesh, Robert John Dixon, Yangsheng Xu, Helen Farley, Sneja Marina Gunew and Renisa Mawani. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, Australian Literary Studies, Journal of Intercultural Studies, Comma and Hecate.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact