Christopher L. Rees
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Papers in
-
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 5
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 5
- Co-authors
- Giorgio A. Ascoli (8 shared papers)Diek W. Wheeler (6 shared papers)David J. Hamilton (6 shared papers)Charise M. White (6 shared papers)Alexander O. Komendantov (4 shared papers)Thomas Farrell (1 shared paper)Julietta Patnick (2 shared papers)Morris Ej (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gut (3 papers)eLife (1 paper)British Journal of Cancer (1 paper)eNeuro (1 paper)Brain Informatics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Christopher L. Rees
15 papers receiving 392 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Cognitive Neuroscience 202
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 187
- Neurology 65
- Biophysics 40
- Oncology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher L. Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher L. Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher L. Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher L. Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher L. Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher L. Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher L. Rees. The network helps show where Christopher L. Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher L. Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 1 |
About Christopher L. Rees
Christopher L. Rees is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (1 paper) and Information and Cyber Security (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (202 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (187 citations), Neurology (65 citations), Biophysics (40 citations) and Oncology (66 citations). Christopher L. Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Giorgio A. Ascoli, Diek W. Wheeler, David J. Hamilton, Charise M. White, Alexander O. Komendantov, Thomas Farrell, Julietta Patnick, Morris Ej, Claire Nickerson and Philip Quirke. Their work appears in journals such as Gut, eLife, British Journal of Cancer, eNeuro and Brain Informatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.