Brain Informatics

238 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 238 papers published in Brain Informatics in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Brain Informatics usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (148 papers), Artificial Intelligence (42 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (37 papers) specifically the topics of EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (75 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (64 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Informatics are Andreas Holzinger, Jyoti Islam, Yanqing Zhang, Laurent Torlay, Elizabeth Thomas, Monica Baciu, Marcela Perrone‐Bertolotti, Christopher R. Madan, Mufti Mahmud and Yash Paul.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Brain Informatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Informatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Informatics.

Countries where authors publish in Brain Informatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Informatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Informatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Informatics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025