Christopher Hogg

37 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Christopher Hogg
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Ophthalmology 211
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 214
  • Molecular Biology 470
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 40
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 117
Replace Ryan B. MacDonald with:
Ryan B. MacDonald United Kingdom
F.P.J. Diecke United States
Charles Auker United States
Bret A. Hughes United States
Fran Shen United States
Tomoaki Usui Japan
Patricia A. Grimes United States
William W. Dawson United States
Omar H. Butt United States
Robin Roberts United States
Christopher Hogg relative to Ryan B. MacDonald United Kingdom Ryan B. MacDonald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Ryan B. MacDonald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Hogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Hogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Hogg. The network helps show where Christopher Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Hogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Hogg Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Hogg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982152
2 1983119
3 199269
4 198560
5 200153
6 198349
7 198544
8 201142
9 201737
10 199935
11 201733
12 201832
13 198829
14 201727
15 200327
16 201824
17 202024
18 199220
19 201720
20 199119

About Christopher Hogg

Christopher Hogg is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Apelin-related biomedical research (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (211 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (214 citations), Molecular Biology (470 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (40 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (117 citations). Christopher Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include G. B. Arden, Vaegan, Glen Jeffery, Finbarr O’Harte, Vadivel Parthsarathy, Peter R. Flatt, Graham E. Holder, Michael Quinlan, Wolfgang Ernst and A. L. Lyness. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Documenta Ophthalmologica, Vision Research, Eye and Philosophical magazine. A/Philosophical magazine. A. Physics of condensed matter. Structure, defects and mechanical properties.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact