Christopher Ford

21 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers

Christopher Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Aging 33
  • Reproductive Medicine 127
  • Cell Biology 194
  • Physiology 36
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 203
Replace Chao Yu with:
Chao Yu China
Nicolas Gévry Canada
Xiangyuan Wang United States
Isabelle Pellerin France
Scott J. Parkinson United States
Audesh Bhat India
Ok-Kyong Park-Sarge United States
Hua-Ying Fan United States
Kelwyn Thomas United States
J. Saadi Imam United States
Christopher Ford relative to Chao Yu China Chao Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Chao Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Ford. The network helps show where Christopher Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Ford Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991243
2 2014167
3 201782
4 201974
5 200866
6 201560
7 200842
8 201642
9 199532
10 201931
11 201629
12 200725
13 201620
14 202015
15 201612
16 19998
17 19837
18 19834
19 19804
20 20092

About Christopher Ford

Christopher Ford is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cell Biology, Physiology and Biochemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (33 citations), Reproductive Medicine (127 citations), Cell Biology (194 citations), Physiology (36 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (203 citations). Christopher Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Minshull, Hideki Kobayashi, Roy M. Golsteyn, Tim Hunt, Randy Y.C. Poon, Cherlyn Ding, Thomas H. Steele, Bing Chen, Dan Gao and Matthew Fok. Their work appears in journals such as Development, Journal of Cell Science, Haematologica, The FASEB Journal and The International Journal of Developmental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact