Deborah Tepper

1.9k citations
67 papers · 1.4k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Tepper

61 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Deborah Tepper
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 719
  • Neurology 152
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 121
  • Neurology 65
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 32
Replace Maryam Khaleghi Ghadiri with:
Maryam Khaleghi Ghadiri Germany
Andrea Negro Italy
Zhiqiang Yang China
Jerome Goldstein United States
Hasan Rıfat Koyuncuoğlu Türkiye
Peyman Petramfar Iran
Yang Lü China
Jan L. Bjersing Sweden
Maurizio Evangelista Italy
Marcin Włodarczyk Poland
Deborah Tepper relative to Maryam Khaleghi Ghadiri Germany Maryam Khaleghi Ghadiri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16×
Maryam Khaleghi Ghadiri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Tepper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Tepper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Tepper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Tepper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Tepper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Tepper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Tepper. The network helps show where Deborah Tepper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Tepper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Tepper Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Tepper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013332
2 2016173
3 2016163
4 201290
5 200888
6 201267
7 201566
8 201161
9 200844
10 201036
11 201530
12 201525
13 201720
14 200719
15 200816
16 202016
17 201715
18 201211
19 201110
20 201310

About Deborah Tepper

Deborah Tepper is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Neurology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (54 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper) and Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (719 citations), Neurology (152 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (121 citations), Neurology (65 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (32 citations). Deborah Tepper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Shaheen Emmanuel Lakhan, Nancy E. Kelley, Annette L. Kirchgessner, Stewart J. Tepper, MARCELO EDUARDO BIGAL, Fred D. Sheftell, Alan M. Rapoport, Suzanne N. Christie, Serena Laura Orr and Mia Tova Minen. Their work appears in journals such as Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Neurology, Frontiers in Neurology, Pain Medicine and Current Pain and Headache Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact