Christopher Daniel Smith

34 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Christopher Daniel Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Speech and Hearing 124
  • Toxicology 38
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Health 58
  • General Health Professions 149
Replace Ronald J. Peters with:
Ronald J. Peters United States
Kimberly G. Wagoner United States
Sarah Blenkinsop United Kingdom
Karl Bohrn Italy
Marina Kuzman Croatia
Silvana N. Skara United States
Michal Miovský Czechia
Timothy A. McAfee United States
Kathryn Higgins United Kingdom
Salme Ahlström Finland
Christopher Daniel Smith relative to Ronald J. Peters United States Ronald J. Peters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Ronald J. Peters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Daniel Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Daniel Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Daniel Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Daniel Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Daniel Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Daniel Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Daniel Smith. The network helps show where Christopher Daniel Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Daniel Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Daniel Smith Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Daniel Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993117
2 199256
3 199255
4 199051
5 199450
6 199231
7 199325
8 201425
9 199422
10 199018
11 199116
12 201315
13 200114
14 198710
15 19949
16 19918
17 20127
18 19927
19 19907
20 19946

About Christopher Daniel Smith

Christopher Daniel Smith is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Epidemiology, Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Health and Nursing Education (9 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (4 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (2 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (124 citations), Toxicology (38 citations), Applied Psychology (36 citations), Health (58 citations) and General Health Professions (149 citations). Christopher Daniel Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Don Nutbeam, Laurence Moore, Paul Bennett, Adrian Ernest Bauman, Simon Murphy, John Catford, Chris Roberts, Gordon Macdonald, S. Jeal and Robert A. Biddlecombe. Their work appears in journals such as Health Education Research, Health Promotion International, Journal of the Intensive Care Society, Clinical Medicine and Alcohol and Alcoholism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact