Chongyang Li

3.2k citations
140 papers · 2.2k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Chongyang Li

126 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Chongyang Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Materials Chemistry 788
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 238
  • Biomaterials 132
  • Biomedical Engineering 442
  • Cancer Research 145
Replace Long Qian with:
Long Qian China
Kejun Wang China
Xiaobo Zhang China
Masahiko Ishida Japan
Hanqing Liu China
V. Chandana Epa Australia
Moonil Kim South Korea
Chongyang Li relative to Long Qian China Long Qian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Long Qian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chongyang Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chongyang Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chongyang Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chongyang Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chongyang Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chongyang Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chongyang Li. The network helps show where Chongyang Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chongyang Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chongyang Li Line = papers co-authored together Chongyang Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2022112
2 201589
3 202185
4 202267
5 201264
6 202164
7 202061
8 202059
9 201259
10 202358
11 202256
12 201855
13 202150
14 202247
15 202146
16 202145
17 201643
18 202034
19 202434
20 201434

About Chongyang Li

Chongyang Li is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 140 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (15 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (10 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (10 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (9 papers), Dielectric materials and actuators (9 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (8 papers), Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies (8 papers) and Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (788 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (238 citations), Biomaterials (132 citations), Biomedical Engineering (442 citations) and Cancer Research (145 citations). Chongyang Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Jiwei Zhai, Wangfeng Bai, Peng Zheng, Jikang Liu, Jingji Zhang, Shiting Wu, Hongjuan Cui, Kui Zhang, Guangzhao Pan and Qian Xiong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Electronic Materials Letters, IEEE Access, Ceramics International and Journal of Molecular Liquids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact