Chloe Preece

513 citations
25 papers · 335 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Marketing top 5%
    • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
    • Cultural Industries and Urban Development

Papers in

Chloe Preece

23 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

Chloe Preece
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Marketing 140
  • Urban Studies 67
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 53
  • Museology 27
  • Business and International Management 9
Replace Marylouise Caldwell with:
Marylouise Caldwell Australia
Benjamin J. Hartmann Sweden
Lise Skov Denmark
Iain MacRury United Kingdom
Thomas Frank Germany
Laura R. Oswald United States
Nina Diamond United States
Ulla Hakala Finland
Katya Johanson Australia
Diana Storm United States
Chloe Preece relative to Marylouise Caldwell Australia Marylouise Caldwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Marylouise Caldwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chloe Preece

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe Preece's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe Preece with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe Preece more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe Preece

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe Preece. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe Preece. The network helps show where Chloe Preece may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Chloe Preece, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chloe Preece Line = papers co-authored together Chloe Preece links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201559
2 201849
3 201540
4 201628
5 202225
6 202020
7 201520
8 202220
9 201413
10 202313
11 201510
12 20199
13 20235
14 20235
15 20234
16 20183
17 20233
18 20232
19 20242
20 20252

About Chloe Preece

Chloe Preece is a scholar working on Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 25 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (6 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Service and Product Innovation (3 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (140 citations), Urban Studies (67 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (53 citations), Museology (27 citations) and Business and International Management (9 citations). Chloe Preece has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Finola Kerrigan, Daragh O’Reilly, Pauline Maclaran, Olga Kravets, Stephanie Janes, Benedetta Cappellini, Gretchen Larsen, Debbie Keeling, Andrew Lindridge and Elizabeth Parsons. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marketing Management, European Journal of Marketing, Journal of Macromarketing, Annals of Tourism Research and Consumption Markets & Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact