Chloe Bryson‐Cahn

35 papers receiving 876 citations

Peers

Chloe Bryson‐Cahn
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Finance 265
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 38
  • General Dentistry 27
  • Infectious Diseases 189
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 155
Replace Federica Secci with:
Federica Secci United States
Shamsuzzoha B Syed Switzerland
Kristian Schultz Hansen Denmark
Fatuma Manzi Tanzania
Aklilu Endalamaw Ethiopia
Ada Kwan United States
Benjamin Daniels United States
Sarabjit Chadha India
A. M. V. Kumar India
Hemant Deepak Shewade India
Chloe Bryson‐Cahn relative to Federica Secci United States Federica Secci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Federica Secci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chloe Bryson‐Cahn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe Bryson‐Cahn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe Bryson‐Cahn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe Bryson‐Cahn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe Bryson‐Cahn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe Bryson‐Cahn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe Bryson‐Cahn. The network helps show where Chloe Bryson‐Cahn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloe Bryson‐Cahn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chloe Bryson‐Cahn Line = papers co-authored together Chloe Bryson‐Cahn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006187
2 2006155
3 202074
4 201973
5 201962
6 202055
7 202034
8 200732
9 200728
10 202025
11 202322
12 202121
13 202021
14 202420
15 200719
16 202017
17 202011
18 20228
19 20208
20 20177

About Chloe Bryson‐Cahn

Chloe Bryson‐Cahn is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Clinical Biochemistry, Infectious Diseases, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and General Health Professions, having authored 39 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (10 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (9 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (9 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (5 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (5 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (3 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (265 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (38 citations), General Dentistry (27 citations), Infectious Diseases (189 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (155 citations). Chloe Bryson‐Cahn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Barofsky, John B. Lynch, Jeannie D. Chan, Sergio Sesma, Felícia Marie Knaul, Héctor Arreola‐Ornelas, Oscar Méndez-Carniado, Rafael Lozano, Christopher J L Murray and Dennis M. Feehan. Their work appears in journals such as Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, The Lancet and Spine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact