Ching‐Chiung Wang

4.0k citations
90 papers · 3.4k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Chiung Wang

89 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Ching‐Chiung Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Biochemistry 315
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 404
  • Pharmacology 441
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 145
  • Toxicology 99
Replace Lih-Geeng Chen with:
Lih-Geeng Chen Taiwan
Ya‐Nan Yang China
Jae‐Ha Ryu South Korea
Seung‐Heon Hong South Korea
Hyeong‐Kyu Lee South Korea
Birgit Waltenberger Austria
Siwang Wang China
Young‐Sam Keum South Korea
Kyung‐Sik Song South Korea
Kasi Pandima Devi India
Ching‐Chiung Wang relative to Lih-Geeng Chen Taiwan Lih-Geeng Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lih-Geeng Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Chiung Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Chiung Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Chiung Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Chiung Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Chiung Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Chiung Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Chiung Wang. The network helps show where Ching‐Chiung Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Chiung Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Chiung Wang Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Chiung Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007346
2 2009220
3 2017176
4 2008118
5 2014106
6 2006106
7 201398
8 200597
9 201095
10 201094
11 201692
12 200371
13 200070
14 201167
15 200665
16 201463
17 201561
18 200259
19 200958
20 200257

About Ching‐Chiung Wang

Ching‐Chiung Wang is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (12 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (9 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (8 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (7 papers), Phytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants (7 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (6 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (5 papers) and Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (315 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (404 citations), Pharmacology (441 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (145 citations) and Toxicology (99 citations). Ching‐Chiung Wang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Lih-Geeng Chen, Lingling Yang, Chia‐Jung Lee, Sung‐Hui Tseng, Wen‐Chi Hou, Po‐Wei Tsai, Ting-Yi Chien, Guan-Cheng Huang, Shyr-Yi Lin and Chih‐Hsiung Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Planta Medica and Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact