Asian Journal of Psychiatry

2.5k papers and 33.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Asian Journal of Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 33.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Journal of Psychiatry usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (845 papers) and Social Psychology (510 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (442 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (397 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (323 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Journal of Psychiatry are Ravi Philip Rajkumar, Amir Moghanibashi‐Mansourieh, Debanjan Banerjee, Matcheri S. Keshavan, Sandeep Grover, Mamidipalli Sai Spoorthy, Rajiv Tandon, Jason Richard Dean, Sujita Kumar Kar and Deblina Roy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Journal of Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Journal of Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Journal of Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Journal of Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Journal of Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Journal of Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Journal of Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025