Chih‐Ken Chen

2.3k citations
71 papers · 1.7k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Chih‐Ken Chen

70 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Chih‐Ken Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 793
  • Biological Psychiatry 102
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 438
  • Clinical Psychology 399
  • Nephrology 131
Replace In‐Kwa Jung with:
In‐Kwa Jung South Korea
Tomifusa Kuboki Japan
Sandra Matheson Australia
Cristina Segura‐Garcìa Italy
Melissa Kitner‐Triolo United States
Paul Waraich Canada
Francesco Catapano Italy
Lorena Hsu Canada
Hamid Afshar Iran
Jeffrey P. Reiss Canada
Chih‐Ken Chen relative to In‐Kwa Jung South Korea In‐Kwa Jung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
In‐Kwa Jung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chih‐Ken Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih‐Ken Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih‐Ken Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih‐Ken Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih‐Ken Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih‐Ken Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih‐Ken Chen. The network helps show where Chih‐Ken Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chih‐Ken Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chih‐Ken Chen Line = papers co-authored together Chih‐Ken Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006235
2 2010141
3 201078
4 201063
5 200758
6 200852
7 202151
8 200649
9 200744
10 201843
11 201041
12 201535
13 201233
14 200530
15 201430
16 201426
17 201626
18 201125
19 200725
20 201925

About Chih‐Ken Chen

Chih‐Ken Chen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (19 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (15 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (7 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (793 citations), Biological Psychiatry (102 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (438 citations), Clinical Psychology (399 citations) and Nephrology (131 citations). Chih‐Ken Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Liang‐Jen Wang, Yu‐Shu Huang, Philip Asherson, Yi‐Chih Chen, Keeley J. Brookes, Gerome Breen, Shih‐Ku Lin, Xiaohui Xu, Jonathan Mill and Heng-Jung Hsu. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, Substance Use & Misuse, BMC Psychiatry, Scientific Reports and Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact