Chih‐Feng Lin

573 citations
23 papers · 415 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Chih‐Feng Lin

23 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Chih‐Feng Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Otorhinolaryngology 86
  • Ecological Modeling 29
  • Immunology and Allergy 18
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 38
  • Biological Psychiatry 6
Replace Chenguang Zheng with:
Chenguang Zheng China
Bashar Shakhtour United States
Brian C. Bock Colombia
Joseph Rodriguez France
Mülder Netherlands
Chester T. Stafford United States
Kim E. Kortekaas Netherlands
Ann Erlandsson Sweden
Jean‐Michel Maes France
Guillermo Rodríguez‐Domínguez Mexico
Chih‐Feng Lin relative to Chenguang Zheng China Chenguang Zheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Chenguang Zheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chih‐Feng Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih‐Feng Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih‐Feng Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih‐Feng Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih‐Feng Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih‐Feng Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih‐Feng Lin. The network helps show where Chih‐Feng Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chih‐Feng Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chih‐Feng Lin Line = papers co-authored together Chih‐Feng Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003122
2 201247
3 200727
4 200827
5 201826
6 202121
7 201219
8 201914
9 201914
10 201914
11 202213
12
Ultrasound imaging aids infraclavicular brachial plexus block.
199313
13 202312
14 201912
15 20207
16 20186
17 20155
18 20234
19 20164
20 20223

About Chih‐Feng Lin

Chih‐Feng Lin is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sinusitis and nasal conditions (7 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (1 paper) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (86 citations), Ecological Modeling (29 citations), Immunology and Allergy (18 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (38 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (6 citations). Chih‐Feng Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anne Chao, Tsung‐Jen Shen, Te‐Huei Yeh, Yi‐Tsen Lin, Pei‐Jen Lou, Chun‐Kang Liao, Wen‐Song Hwang, Wen‐Hua Chen, Tsung‐Lin Yang and Cheng‐Ping Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, Medicine, Bioresource Technology and Head & Neck.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact