Cheryl K. Stenmark

24 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Cheryl K. Stenmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Information Systems and Management 154
  • General Decision Sciences 11
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 99
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 52
  • Safety Research 32
Replace Yeonjeong Kim with:
Yeonjeong Kim United States
Andrea Pittarello United States
María Stavraki Spain
Beth A. Pontari United States
Roman Souček Germany
Nadav Goldschmied United States
Janet Kleber Austria
Todd C. Murtha United States
Loretta N. McGregor United States
Cheryl K. Stenmark relative to Yeonjeong Kim United States Yeonjeong Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Yeonjeong Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl K. Stenmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl K. Stenmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl K. Stenmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl K. Stenmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl K. Stenmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl K. Stenmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl K. Stenmark. The network helps show where Cheryl K. Stenmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl K. Stenmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl K. Stenmark Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl K. Stenmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201046
2 201134
3 201128
4 202026
5 201125
6 201224
7 201124
8 201121
9 202016
10 201313
11 201310
12 20198
13 20237
14 20167
15 20206
16 20105
17 20214
18 20144
19 20223
20 20183

About Cheryl K. Stenmark

Cheryl K. Stenmark is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (18 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (154 citations), General Decision Sciences (11 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (52 citations) and Safety Research (32 citations). Cheryl K. Stenmark has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Mumford, Alison L. Antes, Chase E. Thiel, Xiaoqian Wang, Lynn D. Devenport, Jay J. Caughron, Laura E. Martin, Shane Connelly, Katherine Riley and Robert Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Accountability in Research, Journal of Academic Ethics, Ethics & Behavior and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact