Cherie Simpson

516 citations
21 papers · 367 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Cherie Simpson

20 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Cherie Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Clinical Psychology 90
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 54
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 52
  • Safety Research 28
  • General Health Professions 46
Replace Elizabeth B. Yost with:
Elizabeth B. Yost United States
Hamido A. Megahead Egypt
Victoria A. Grunberg United States
Elizabeth Fraser United States
Kathryn E. Boehm United States
Selene Valero‐Moreno Spain
Karol Czuba New Zealand
Gülseren Keskin Türkiye
Vicki Ashton United States
Kendra Beitz United States
Cherie Simpson relative to Elizabeth B. Yost United States Elizabeth B. Yost's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Elizabeth B. Yost · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cherie Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cherie Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cherie Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cherie Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cherie Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cherie Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cherie Simpson. The network helps show where Cherie Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Cherie Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cherie Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Cherie Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199664
2 201547
3 201337
4 201326
5 201324
6 200923
7 200918
8 201317
9 200416
10 201415
11 201315
12 201415
13 201414
14 200913
15 20107
16 20156
17 20184
18 20073
19 20252
20 20131

About Cherie Simpson

Cherie Simpson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (4 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (1 paper) and Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (90 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (54 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (52 citations), Safety Research (28 citations) and General Health Professions (46 citations). Cherie Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Carter, Barbara LeRoy, Joseph C. Allegra, Amara E. Ezeamama, Toni P. Miles, Jennifer Elkins, Gayle J. Acton, Kerstin Gerst-Emerson, Ligang Song and Yixiao Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Holistic Nursing, Quality of Life Research, Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Applied Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact