Chen‐Chung Liu

125 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Chen‐Chung Liu
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 476
  • Biological Psychiatry 68
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 521
  • Control and Systems Engineering 336
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 275
Replace Xiaomei Peng with:
Xiaomei Peng United States
Yong Xu China
Marnie Shaw Australia
Christopher J. James United Kingdom
Hui Shen China
George N. Papadimitriou Greece
Jesús Poza Spain
Erick J. Canales‐Rodríguez Spain
John P. John India
Boreom Lee South Korea
Chen‐Chung Liu relative to Xiaomei Peng United States Xiaomei Peng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.8×
Xiaomei Peng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chen‐Chung Liu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chen‐Chung Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen‐Chung Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen‐Chung Liu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chen‐Chung Liu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen‐Chung Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen‐Chung Liu. The network helps show where Chen‐Chung Liu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen‐Chung Liu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chen‐Chung Liu Line = papers co-authored together Chen‐Chung Liu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994227
2 2012200
3 199398
4 201375
5 201260
6 201551
7 201251
8 201348
9 200747
10 202041
11 199541
12 201538
13 201232
14 202032
15 201231
16 201630
17 201028
18 201228
19 201626
20 201524

About Chen‐Chung Liu

Chen‐Chung Liu is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 131 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (49 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (8 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (5 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers), Advanced Image Fusion Techniques (5 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (476 citations), Biological Psychiatry (68 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (521 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (336 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (275 citations). Chen‐Chung Liu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fu-Chuang Chen, Hai‐Gwo Hwu, Ming H. Hsieh, Chih‐Min Liu, Tzung‐Jeng Hwang, Yi‐Ling Chien, Wen‐Yih Isaac Tseng, Hsiao‐Lan Sharon Wang, Rongjun Yu and Yi‐Ting Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, PLoS ONE, Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Human Brain Mapping and Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact