Charles E. Piper

34 papers receiving 791 citations

Peers

Charles E. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Chemical Health and Safety 19
  • Cancer Research 336
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 236
  • Immunology 389
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 192
Replace Marion G. Valerio with:
Marion G. Valerio United States
S M Colman United Kingdom
K. Johnson United States
M. Bittner United States
Arun R. Pandiri United States
Warren I. Schaeffer United States
M.J. van den Heuvel Canada
Mery Giantin Italy
R.M. Cook United States
Flavia Girolami Italy
Charles E. Piper relative to Marion G. Valerio United States Marion G. Valerio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Marion G. Valerio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Piper. The network helps show where Charles E. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles E. Piper Line = papers co-authored together Charles E. Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198291
2 198371
3 197766
4 197866
5 197951
6
Seroepidemiological evidence for horizontal transmission of bovine C-type virus.
197549
7
Role of colostrum and milk in the natural transmission of the bovine leukemia virus.
198148
8 198147
9 197744
10 199042
11 196241
12 199140
13 198839
14 199633
15 198129
16 198827
17 197725
18 197624
19 198121
20 197519

About Charles E. Piper

Charles E. Piper is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 35 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (14 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (11 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (8 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (5 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (3 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (19 citations), Cancer Research (336 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (236 citations), Immunology (389 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (192 citations). Charles E. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and India. Frequent co-authors include Jorge F. Ferrer, S.J. Kenyon, Robert R. Marshak, T.J. Oberly, Y. Oshiro, Nancy McCarroll, D. A. Abt, Steen Bech‐Nielsen, Michael L. Garriott and Robert W. McCuen. Their work appears in journals such as Infection and Immunity, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Veterinary Microbiology, Toxicologic Pathology and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact