Charles E. Piper

32 papers receiving 750 citations

Peers

Charles E. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Chemical Health and Safety 16
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 240
  • Cancer Research 316
  • Immunology 361
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 177
Replace S M Colman with:
S M Colman United Kingdom
K. Johnson United States
M.J. van den Heuvel Canada
Arun R. Pandiri United States
Warren I. Schaeffer United States
Roman J. Pienta United States
C. Lafarge‐Frayssinet France
Akira Niwa Japan
J. J. van der Watt South Africa
Carrie E. Whitmire United States
Charles E. Piper relative to S M Colman United Kingdom S M Colman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17.1×
S M Colman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Piper. The network helps show where Charles E. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles E. Piper Line = papers co-authored together Charles E. Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198288
2 197765
3 198361
4 197858
5 197947
6
Seroepidemiological evidence for horizontal transmission of bovine C-type virus.
197544
7
Role of colostrum and milk in the natural transmission of the bovine leukemia virus.
198143
8 198143
9 199041
10 197741
11 198837
12 199136
13 196235
14 199631
15 198126
16 198825
17 197723
18 197622
19 198121
20 197515

About Charles E. Piper

Charles E. Piper is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 33 papers that have together received 881 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (14 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (11 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (8 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (5 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (16 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (240 citations), Cancer Research (316 citations), Immunology (361 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (177 citations). Charles E. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and France. Frequent co-authors include Jorge F. Ferrer, S.J. Kenyon, T.J. Oberly, D. A. Abt, Robert R. Marshak, Y. Oshiro, Nancy McCarroll, Steen Bech‐Nielsen, Michael L. Garriott and Robert W. McCuen. Their work appears in journals such as Infection and Immunity, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Veterinary Microbiology, JAMA and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact