Chang-Le Tie

696 citations
12 papers · 636 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Chang-Le Tie

12 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers

Chang-Le Tie
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 389
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 175
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 65
  • Biological Psychiatry 5
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 9
Replace Michael‐Paul Schallmo with:
Michael‐Paul Schallmo United States
Carolin Opgen‐Rhein Germany
Ryan G. Kelley United States
Bernhard M. Meyer Austria
Dajung J. Kim United States
Annett Höse Germany
Ashley N. Sutherland United States
Julie M. McCarthy United States
Yvonne Czechowska Canada
Yajing Pang China
Chang-Le Tie relative to Michael‐Paul Schallmo United States Michael‐Paul Schallmo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Michael‐Paul Schallmo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chang-Le Tie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chang-Le Tie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chang-Le Tie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chang-Le Tie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chang-Le Tie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chang-Le Tie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chang-Le Tie. The network helps show where Chang-Le Tie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chang-Le Tie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chang-Le Tie Line = papers co-authored together Chang-Le Tie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2012121
2 201293
3 201269
4 201263
5 201259
6 201758
7 201652
8 201349
9 201733
10 201322
11 201313
12 20224

About Chang-Le Tie

Chang-Le Tie is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Genetics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (389 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (175 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (65 citations), Biological Psychiatry (5 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (9 citations). Chang-Le Tie has collaborated with scholars based in China, Macao and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yongjun Wang, Chuanyue Wang, Jie Dong, Xin Ma, Chunhong Liu, Sufang Li, Xia Wu, Zhen Zhou, Dan Zhang and Zhen Yuan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, Frontiers in Psychiatry and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact