Chang‐Ching Tu

914 citations
45 papers · 555 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Chang‐Ching Tu

41 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

Chang‐Ching Tu
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Materials Chemistry 340
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 87
  • Biomedical Engineering 195
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 249
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 69
Replace Hailong Wang with:
Hailong Wang China
Xinhui Zhang China
Tae Jung Kim South Korea
Daniel M. Dryden United States
Lina Ji China
Zheng Yuan China
Sergej Filonovich Portugal
Eva M. Campo United States
Yufei Liu United States
Chongling Sun China
Chang‐Ching Tu relative to Hailong Wang China Hailong Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Hailong Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chang‐Ching Tu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chang‐Ching Tu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chang‐Ching Tu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chang‐Ching Tu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chang‐Ching Tu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chang‐Ching Tu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chang‐Ching Tu. The network helps show where Chang‐Ching Tu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chang‐Ching Tu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chang‐Ching Tu Line = papers co-authored together Chang‐Ching Tu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202251
2 202251
3 202232
4 201132
5 201731
6 201429
7 201628
8 202426
9 200826
10 202024
11 201122
12 201921
13 201014
14 201914
15 202114
16 202113
17 201112
18 201212
19 202311
20 201810

About Chang‐Ching Tu

Chang‐Ching Tu is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 45 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (16 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (10 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (9 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (7 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (6 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers) and GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (340 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (87 citations), Biomedical Engineering (195 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (249 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (69 citations). Chang‐Ching Tu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lih Y. Lin, Hao‐Chung Kuo, Shanshan Han, Yaw‐Kuen Li, Guozhong Cao, Lili Jing, Chen Guo, Apostolos T. Voutsas, Liang Tang and Chao‐Chang A. Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Applied Physics Letters, ACS Photonics and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact