Catherine E. Bach

56 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Catherine E. Bach
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Insect Science 495
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 473
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 617
  • Ecology 541
  • Plant Science 415
Replace Randy K. Bangert with:
Randy K. Bangert United States
Nash E. Turley United States
Norris Z. Muth United States
Martin R. Speight United Kingdom
Amy Wolf United States
Vesna Gagić Australia
Frédéric Ysnel France
K. F. Conrad United Kingdom
P. A. Morrow United States
Arnaud Sentis France
Catherine E. Bach relative to Randy K. Bangert United States Randy K. Bangert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Randy K. Bangert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine E. Bach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine E. Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine E. Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine E. Bach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine E. Bach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine E. Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine E. Bach. The network helps show where Catherine E. Bach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Catherine E. Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine E. Bach Line = papers co-authored together Catherine E. Bach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980160
2 1976129
3 1991112
4 198881
5 197976
6 198872
7 199461
8 199038
9 198937
10 198135
11 199734
12 200126
13 200424
14 199023
15
Effects of forest edges, fruit display size, and fruit colour on bird seed dispersal in a New Zealand mistletoe, Alepis flavida
200422
16 200520
17 199319
18 198618
19 200018
20 199418

About Catherine E. Bach

Catherine E. Bach is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (19 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (18 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (15 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (12 papers), Marine and fisheries research (9 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (8 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (495 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (473 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (617 citations), Ecology (541 citations) and Plant Science (415 citations). Catherine E. Bach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian A. Hazlett, Dan Rittschof, Dave Kelly, W. S. Lawrence, Bruce E. Tabashnik, Cynthia Shen, William F. Herrnkind, Colin L. McLay, Deborah Carr and Allan J. Hruska. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Oecologia, Ecological Entomology, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology and Australian Journal of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact