Celia Woolf

692 citations
18 papers · 538 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Celia Woolf

18 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers

Celia Woolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Occupational Therapy 253
  • Rehabilitation 154
  • Human-Computer Interaction 76
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 159
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 22
Replace Niamh Devane with:
Niamh Devane United Kingdom
Anna Caute United Kingdom
Shira Yalon‐Chamovitz Israel
Susan E. Toth-Cohen United States
Richard Talbot United Kingdom
Bart Melis-Dankers Netherlands
Heather A. Feldner United States
Viviana Perilli Italy
James Lenker United States
Kelly Knollman-Porter United States
Celia Woolf relative to Niamh Devane United Kingdom Niamh Devane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Niamh Devane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Woolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Woolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Woolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Woolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Woolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Woolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Woolf. The network helps show where Celia Woolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Celia Woolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia Woolf Line = papers co-authored together Celia Woolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2015105
2 201588
3 201686
4 201535
5 201735
6 201832
7 201829
8 201823
9 202023
10 201522
11 201816
12
Beyond Aphasia: Therapies For Living With Communication Disability
201713
13 201912
14 20148
15 20214
16 20183
17 20233
18 20181

About Celia Woolf

Celia Woolf is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 18 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (15 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (8 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (1 paper), Usability and User Interface Design (1 paper) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (253 citations), Rehabilitation (154 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (76 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (159 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (22 citations). Celia Woolf has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane Marshall, Stephanie Wilson, Julia Galliers, Anna Caute, Niamh Devane, Tracey Booth, Richard Talbot, Madeline N. Cruice, Abi Roper and Shashivadan P. Hirani. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, CoDesign, PLoS ONE and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact