Celia Woolf
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 14
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 10
- Co-authors
- Jane Marshall (13 shared papers)Stephanie Wilson (10 shared papers)Julia Galliers (6 shared papers)Anna Caute (8 shared papers)Niamh Devane (5 shared papers)Tracey Booth (3 shared papers)Richard Talbot (4 shared papers)Abi Roper (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Aphasiology (7 papers)International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (3 papers)Clinical Rehabilitation (1 paper)CoDesign (1 paper)Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaMexico
In The Last Decade
Celia Woolf
17 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Rehabilitation 245
- Occupational Therapy 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 301
- Human-Computer Interaction 44
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 18
Countries citing papers authored by Celia Woolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Woolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Woolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Woolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Woolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Woolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Woolf. The network helps show where Celia Woolf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Celia Woolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 90 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 11 | Beyond Aphasia: Therapies For Living With Communication Disability | 2017 | 11 |
| 12 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 |
About Celia Woolf
Celia Woolf is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (14 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (5 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Action Observation and Synchronization (1 paper) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (245 citations), Occupational Therapy (104 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (301 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (44 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (18 citations). Celia Woolf has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Jane Marshall, Stephanie Wilson, Julia Galliers, Anna Caute, Niamh Devane, Tracey Booth, Richard Talbot, Abi Roper, Helen Greenwood and Madeline Cruice. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Clinical Rehabilitation, CoDesign and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.