Niamh Devane
Impact in
- Occupational Therapy top 1%
- Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Papers in
-
- Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility 15
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 9
- Co-authors
- Jane Marshall (15 shared papers)Stephanie Wilson (13 shared papers)Celia Woolf (5 shared papers)Richard Talbot (10 shared papers)Julia Galliers (4 shared papers)Tracey Booth (3 shared papers)Abi Roper (5 shared papers)Katerina Hilari (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Aphasiology (5 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)Disability and Rehabilitation (3 papers)International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (2 papers)CoDesign (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Niamh Devane
17 papers receiving 414 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Occupational Therapy 174
- Rehabilitation 142
- Human-Computer Interaction 86
- Cognitive Neuroscience 126
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 16
Countries citing papers authored by Niamh Devane
This map shows the geographic impact of Niamh Devane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Niamh Devane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Niamh Devane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Niamh Devane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Niamh Devane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Niamh Devane. The network helps show where Niamh Devane may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Niamh Devane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 105 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 86 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2026 | 0 |
About Niamh Devane
Niamh Devane is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (15 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (9 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (1 paper) and Usability and User Interface Design (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (174 citations), Rehabilitation (142 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (86 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (126 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (16 citations). Niamh Devane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jane Marshall, Stephanie Wilson, Celia Woolf, Richard Talbot, Julia Galliers, Tracey Booth, Abi Roper, Katerina Hilari, Marcella Carragher and Madeline N. Cruice. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, PLoS ONE, Disability and Rehabilitation, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders and CoDesign.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.