Célia Fourrier

28 papers receiving 722 citations

Peers

Célia Fourrier
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Biological Psychiatry 240
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 162
  • Neurology 130
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 114
  • Physiology 31
Replace Catherine Toben with:
Catherine Toben Australia
Camila O. Arent Brazil
Xu Wu China
Evelin Painsipp Austria
Rahul Dange United States
Shu Xiao China
Ana Djordjević Serbia
Hsiao‐Jou Cortina Chen Australia
Na Yue China
Tina Franklin United States
Célia Fourrier relative to Catherine Toben Australia Catherine Toben's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Catherine Toben · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Célia Fourrier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Célia Fourrier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Célia Fourrier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Célia Fourrier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Célia Fourrier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Célia Fourrier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Célia Fourrier. The network helps show where Célia Fourrier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Célia Fourrier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Célia Fourrier Line = papers co-authored together Célia Fourrier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014113
2 2019104
3 201795
4 201677
5 201854
6 202042
7 202141
8 202139
9 201835
10 201817
11 202216
12 202112
13 202112
14 202011
15 202211
16 20198
17 20238
18 20218
19 20237
20 20207

About Célia Fourrier

Célia Fourrier is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biological Psychiatry, Epidemiology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (12 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (9 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (8 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers) and Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (240 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (162 citations), Neurology (130 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (114 citations) and Physiology (31 citations). Célia Fourrier has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard T. Baune, Sophie Layé, Gaurav Singhal, Lucile Capuron, Timothy J. Sargeant, Natalie Mills, Julien Bensalem, Nathalie Sans, Latifa Hilal and Véronique De Smedt‐Peyrusse. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Behavior and Immunity, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychiatry Research, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and Autophagy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact