Cecil Deans

17 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Cecil Deans
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Research and Theory 48
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
  • Emergency Medical Services 56
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 10
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
Replace Inez D. Kapborg with:
Inez D. Kapborg Sweden
Vicki D. Lachman United States
Maram Ahmed Banakhar Saudi Arabia
Phil Maude Australia
Mick Coleman United States
Sigrid Wangensteen Norway
Patricia B. Howard United States
Mary Neary United Kingdom
Caroline Larue Canada
Peter Nolan United Kingdom
Cecil Deans relative to Inez D. Kapborg Sweden Inez D. Kapborg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Inez D. Kapborg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cecil Deans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecil Deans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecil Deans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecil Deans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecil Deans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecil Deans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecil Deans. The network helps show where Cecil Deans may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Cecil Deans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cecil Deans Line = papers co-authored together Cecil Deans links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200688
2 200455
3 200655
4 200549
5 200549
6 200430
7 200328
8 200426
9 200415
10 199914
11 200513
12 200311
13 200810
14
The Tin-Man and the TAM - A Journey Into M-Learning in the Land of Aus
20109
15 19979
16 19956
17
Web-based Decision Support for Structured Reasoning in Health
20045

About Cecil Deans

Cecil Deans is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Research and Theory and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (48 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations), Emergency Medical Services (56 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (10 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations). Cecil Deans has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rasoul Tabari-Khomeiran, John Little, Lynette J. Stockhausen, Liming You, Ke Liu, Jun ZHANG, Eileen Clark, Lucy Lu, Blake Peck and Terence V. McCann. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Australian journal of advanced nursing and Contemporary Nurse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact