Cath Everett

55 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers

Cath Everett
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Algebra and Number Theory 62
  • Radiation 108
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 35
  • Theoretical Computer Science 9
  • Mathematical Physics 62
Replace Takayuki Tamura with:
Takayuki Tamura United States
Saburou Saitoh Japan
Seymour Haber United States
E. ̃Tassi Italy
Anthony C. Hearn United States
Yu. V. Linnik Slovakia
M. J. Taylor United Kingdom
Silvio Levy United States
A. I. Markushevich Russia
Richard B. Holmes United States
Cath Everett relative to Takayuki Tamura United States Takayuki Tamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Takayuki Tamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cath Everett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cath Everett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cath Everett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cath Everett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cath Everett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cath Everett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cath Everett. The network helps show where Cath Everett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Cath Everett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cath Everett Line = papers co-authored together Cath Everett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A practical manual on the Monte Carlo method for random walk problems
1959186
2 1960145
3 195978
4 201666
5 196334
6 197725
7 197823
8 197521
9 195120
10 197118
11 196615
12 196815
13 201113
14 201510
15 20118
16 20117
17 19717
18 19676
19 19776
20
A THIRD MONTE CARLO SAMPLER (A REVISION AND EXTENSION OF SAMPLERS 1 AND 2)
19836

About Cath Everett

Cath Everett is a scholar working on Information Systems, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 62 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include graph theory and CDMA systems (5 papers), Information and Cyber Security (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers), Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (4 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (3 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers) and Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (62 citations), Radiation (108 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (35 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations) and Mathematical Physics (62 citations). Cath Everett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include E.D. Cashwell, P. R. Stein, Raymond W. Walker, R. R. Baldwin, Roger C. Lyndon, Stanislaw M. Ulam, Richard R. Baker, D. E. Hopkins and N. Metropolis. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete Mathematics, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Advances in Mathematics, Advances in Applied Mathematics and Computer Fraud & Security.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact