Cat Hope

38 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

Cat Hope
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Music 62
  • Space and Planetary Science 6
  • Human-Computer Interaction 17
  • Urban Studies 18
  • Archeology 3
Replace Eliot Bates with:
Eliot Bates United States
Kyle Devine United Kingdom
Sumanth Gopinath United States
Michel Chion
Jeremy Montagu United Kingdom
Kyle Gann United Kingdom
John Tresch United States
Pauline Oliveros United States
Eero Tarasti Finland
Jason Stanyek Hungary
Cat Hope relative to Eliot Bates United States Eliot Bates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Eliot Bates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cat Hope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cat Hope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cat Hope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cat Hope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cat Hope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cat Hope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cat Hope. The network helps show where Cat Hope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Cat Hope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cat Hope Line = papers co-authored together Cat Hope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201732
2 201820
3 201818
4 201916
5 201712
6
Screen Scores: New Media Music Manuscripts
20119
7 20147
8
Digital adaptions of the scores for Cage Variations I, II and III
20126
9 20156
10
Digital Arts: An Introduction to New Media
20146
11 20066
12 20175
13 20134
14 20224
15 20174
16 20204
17 20094
18
ANIMATED MUSIC NOTATION ON THE IPAD
20133
19 19853
20
New digital interactions with John Cage's Variations IV, V and VI
20123

About Cat Hope

Cat Hope is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Music, Signal Processing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Archeology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (20 papers), Music and Audio Processing (11 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (9 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (8 papers), Music History and Culture (7 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (6 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers) and Art, Technology, and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (62 citations), Space and Planetary Science (6 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (17 citations), Urban Studies (18 citations) and Archeology (3 citations). Cat Hope has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sophie Hennekam, Dawn Bennett, John Ryan, Jamie K. Pringle, Martin L. Ferguson, John Cassella, Vivienne Heaton, Jennifer McKinley, Ruth M. Morgan and Alastair Ruffell. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Contemporary Music Review, Organised Sound, Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association and The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact