Cat Hope

456 citations
52 papers · 243 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Cat Hope

42 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Cat Hope
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Music 70
  • Space and Planetary Science 6
  • Archeology 39
  • Human-Computer Interaction 21
  • Urban Studies 21
Replace Eliot Bates with:
Eliot Bates United States
Sumanth Gopinath United States
John Tresch United States
Gascia Ouzounian United Kingdom
Pauline Oliveros United States
Richard Kostelanetz United States
Jason Stanyek United States
Eero Tarasti Finland
David Worrall United Kingdom
Richard M. Shain United States
Cat Hope relative to Eliot Bates United States Eliot Bates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Eliot Bates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cat Hope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cat Hope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cat Hope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cat Hope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cat Hope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cat Hope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cat Hope. The network helps show where Cat Hope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Cat Hope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cat Hope Line = papers co-authored together Cat Hope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201737
2 201823
3 201819
4 201917
5 201714
6
Dakhleh Oasis Project. Report on the Study of Pottery and Kilns
197912
7 201410
8
Screen Scores: New Media Music Manuscripts
20119
9 20068
10 20158
11
Digital Arts: An Introduction to New Media
20147
12
Digital adaptions of the scores for Cage Variations I, II and III
20126
13 19856
14 20225
15 20175
16 20134
17 20204
18 20094
19 20234
20 20174

About Cat Hope

Cat Hope is a scholar working on Music, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Urban Studies, having authored 52 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (20 papers), Music and Audio Processing (11 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (10 papers), Music History and Culture (10 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (8 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (6 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (6 papers) and Art, Technology, and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (70 citations), Space and Planetary Science (6 citations), Archeology (39 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (21 citations) and Urban Studies (21 citations). Cat Hope has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sophie Hennekam, Dawn Bennett, Ruth M. Morgan, Alastair Ruffell, John Cassella, Vivienne Heaton, John Ryan, Jamie K. Pringle, Martin L. Ferguson and Jennifer McKinley. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Contemporary Music Review, Organised Sound, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact