Casey O’Callaghan

1.7k citations
30 papers · 583 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Casey O’Callaghan

29 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Casey O’Callaghan
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 383
  • Sensory Systems 126
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 295
  • Music 37
  • Archeology 10
Replace Fiona Macpherson with:
Fiona Macpherson United Kingdom
G. Gabrielle Starr United States
Crawford Winlove United Kingdom
Zohar Eitan Israel
Matthew MacKisack United Kingdom
Wayne Wu United States
Kathleen Akins Canada
Mark Reybrouck Belgium
Eva Specker Austria
Michael Forster Austria
Casey O’Callaghan relative to Fiona Macpherson United Kingdom Fiona Macpherson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Fiona Macpherson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Casey O’Callaghan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Casey O’Callaghan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Casey O’Callaghan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Casey O’Callaghan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Casey O’Callaghan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Casey O’Callaghan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Casey O’Callaghan. The network helps show where Casey O’Callaghan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Casey O’Callaghan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Casey O’Callaghan Line = papers co-authored together Casey O’Callaghan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200775
2 200770
3 200859
4 201243
5 200841
6 201141
7
Sounds and perception : new philosophical essays
200932
8 201529
9 201225
10 201924
11 201021
12 201519
13 201717
14 200917
15 200915
16 201115
17 20178
18 20075
19 20105
20
Beyond Vision: Philosophical Essays
20175

About Casey O’Callaghan

Casey O’Callaghan is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Philosophy and Plant Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (4 papers), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (3 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (383 citations), Sensory Systems (126 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (295 citations), Music (37 citations) and Archeology (10 citations). Casey O’Callaghan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Nudds, Charan Ranganath, Élisabeth Pacherie, Adele Abrahamsen, Jesse Prinz, Dominic Standage, Ray Jackendoff, H. Clark Barrett, William G. Lycan and Mike Oaksford. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophical Issues, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Multisensory Research and The Monist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact