Multisensory Research

411 papers and 4.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 411 papers published in Multisensory Research in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Multisensory Research usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (312 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (259 papers) and Social Psychology (125 papers) specifically the topics of Multisensory perception and integration (305 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (126 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (123 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Multisensory Research are Charles Spence, David Lando, Cesare Parise, Monica Gori, Qian Janice Wang, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, Maria Gallagher, Felipe Reinoso‐Carvalho, Sharon Zmigrod and Michael Barnett‐Cowan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Multisensory Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Multisensory Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Multisensory Research.

Countries where authors publish in Multisensory Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Multisensory Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Multisensory Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multisensory Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026